Loading market data...
Friday, September 25, 2026
Back to HomeStock AnalysisAll Sysco coverage

Sysco (SYY) FY2026 Free Cash Flow: Lower Capital Spending Drives Most of the Increase

Share

Sysco’s FY2026 free cash flow, measured here as operating cash flow minus capital spending, rose $334M to $1,938M. Lower capital spending supplied $206M of that increase; operating cash flow supplied the remainder. This leaves more cash available for other uses, but does not establish stronger operating profitability. The foodservice distributor’s operating profit barely increased as higher expenses absorbed additional profit after merchandise costs. Sysco’s own free-cash-flow measure also includes asset-sale proceeds, as explained below. 10-K, Item 8, pp. 71, 74

FY2026 ended June 27, 2026. All figures cover Sysco and its consolidated subsidiaries; dollar tables use millions ($M), and $B denotes billions. FY2025 and FY2024 ended June 28, 2025 and June 29, 2024. All three years contained 52 weeks. Calculated changes, ratios and subtotals use the filing’s reported amounts before display rounding. Note 1

1. Receivables and Inventory Grew Faster Than Sales

More money was tied up in amounts owed to Sysco and products awaiting sale.

1-1. Receivables Growth Outpaced Revenue Growth

Compare receivables and inventory growth with revenue growth of 3.9%.

Asset ($M)FY2025FY2026Change
Cash and equivalents1,0711,786+66.8%
Receivables, net5,5025,865+6.6%
Inventory5,0535,338+5.6%
Property and equipment, net6,0845,974−1.8%
Intangibles, excluding goodwill1,080952−11.9%

Receivables include customer and supplier balances; their increase alone does not prove collection problems. Inventory growth also cannot establish excess stock without information about demand and product mix. Sysco uses first-in, first-out costing, charging the earliest purchase costs against sales first. Property balances reflect investment, depreciation and disposals, including transactions in which Sysco sold properties and leased them back. Intangibles—assets such as acquired brands and customer relationships—declined while their costs were being charged against earnings. UK rebranding also started amortization, the gradual charging of an asset’s cost against profit, for brands previously treated as having no fixed useful life. Item 8, p. 70; Notes 1, 8–9; Item 7, p. 53

1-2. Existing Debt Remained Large Before Acquisition Financing

Debt, including finance leases, rose from $13,309M to $13,516M. Supplier payables plus accrued expenses, meaning costs incurred but unpaid, rose from $8,780M to $9,096M. Operating leases added separate obligations of $1,451M, against recorded rights to use leased assets of $1,389M. Item 8, p. 70; Notes 12–13

The market-risk table covers $12,332M of U.S. dollar-denominated debt: $10,032M classified as fixed rate plus $2,300M classified as floating rate. Within that scope, $2,448M matures in FY2027–FY2029, or 19.9%. The $2,300M consists of fixed-rate notes whose interest exposure is converted to floating rates through swaps—agreements under which Sysco receives fixed interest and pays variable interest. The table lists average debt rates of 4.63% and 5.14%, respectively, but 5.14% is also the fixed rate received under the swaps; it is not the resulting variable borrowing cost. Neither figure represents the average rate on all Sysco debt. Refinancing and acquisition funding could change those costs. Item 7A, pp. 61–63

1-3. Accumulated Buybacks Still Reduced the Equity Cushion

Retained earnings, or accumulated profits kept in the business, rose from $13,061M to $13,748M. Contributed capital, comprising common stock and paid-in capital, rose from $2,751M to $2,879M. Repurchased shares held by Sysco deducted $12,947M from equity, versus $12,884M previously; accumulated losses recorded outside net income narrowed from $1,098M to $1,014M. Total assets of $28,397M equaled liabilities of $25,731M plus shareholder equity of $2,666M—the accounting amount left after subtracting liabilities from assets. Item 8, pp. 70, 73

2. Higher Sales Produced Almost No Additional Operating Profit

Operating expenses consumed nearly all the improvement in profit after merchandise costs.

2-1. Profitability Weakened Across the Three-Year Comparison

The margin rows show how much of each sales dollar remained as profit.

Measure ($M, except margins)FY2024FY2025FY2026Annualized change, FY2024–FY2026
Revenue78,84481,37084,553+3.6%
Operating profit3,2023,0883,095−1.7%
Operating margin4.06%3.80%3.66%—
Net income1,9551,8281,757−5.2%
Net margin2.48%2.25%2.08%—

Annualized growth expresses the change as a constant yearly rate across two intervals, not three. Margins equal the corresponding profit divided by revenue. Operating margin fell from 3.80% to 3.66%: Sysco retained about $3.66 in operating profit per $100 of sales. Revenue grew 3.9%, but operating profit grew 0.2%. Item 8, p. 71

Interest expense rose from $635M to $717M, while other expense rose from $38M to $102M. Acquisition financing contributed $30M of financing-cost amortization—fees charged against profit over time—and a $54M loss on agreements intended to lock future borrowing rates. Lower taxes partly offset these pressures, leaving net income down 3.9%. Item 7, pp. 46–47; Item 8, p. 71

Diluted earnings per share—profit spread over shares including potential stock awards—fell from $3.73 to $3.66. Diluted average shares fell from 489.826M to 480.612M. Using those denominators, lower profit reduced earnings per share by approximately $0.145, while fewer shares restored $0.069, before rounding. Repurchases helped reduce the share count, but stock awards also changed it. Item 8, pp. 71, 73

2-2. Payroll and Transformation Costs Absorbed Merchandise Gains

Gross profit, or sales less merchandise costs, rose from $14,969M to $15,639M, but operating expenses increased from $11,881M to $12,544M. In U.S. Foodservice, Sysco attributed higher expenses primarily to employee costs, including sales staffing and incentives. Product purchases vary with sales; staffing, buildings and technology are less immediately flexible. The filing does not provide a complete fixed-versus-variable cost split. Item 7, pp. 40–41; Item 8, p. 71

Sysco’s full-year earnings release quantified higher incentive compensation costs at $100M, with a $0.16 impact on earnings per share. Those costs also weighed on management’s adjusted results, so the expense pressure was not confined to the charges excluded from adjusted profit. FY2026 earnings release

Observed operating leverage—the percentage profit change divided by the percentage sales change—was just 0.06: (3,095/3,088 − 1) ÷ (84,553/81,370 − 1). In plain terms, sales growth translated into very little operating-profit growth. This describes the year’s outcome, not a forecast of how profit responds to future sales.

The following reconciliation shows why management’s adjusted profit differs from profit under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. The adjusted measure is non-GAAP: management adds back selected expenses to the accounting result.

Operating-profit reconciliation ($M)FY2025FY2026
GAAP operating profit3,0883,095
Add restructuring and transformation costs183287
Add acquisition-related costs160232
Add goodwill impairment920
Company-adjusted operating profit, non-GAAP3,5233,614

Goodwill impairment is a charge reducing the recorded value of goodwill from an acquisition. The acquisition adjustment includes ongoing intangible amortization of $133M and $147M, respectively. Transformation costs also appear in both years. Adjusted profit therefore should not be treated as a clean measure of recurring profit with only isolated events removed. Item 7, pp. 46–47

3. Reduced Capital Spending Supplied Most of the Cash Improvement

Cash generation improved, but lower investment contributed more than the increase in operating cash.

Read the last two rows together: the company’s definition adds asset-sale proceeds to cash remaining after capital spending.

Cash measure ($M)FY2025FY2026Change ($M)
Operating cash flow2,5102,638+128
Investing cash flow−717−696+21
Financing cash flow−1,412−1,159+253
Ending cash, including restricted cash1,3482,117+769
Cash capital expenditure906700−206
Free cash flow: operating cash less capital expenditure1,6041,938+334
Company-defined free cash flow, including asset sales1,8182,114+296

Free cash flow is cash remaining after the specified investment deduction, not an additional GAAP profit measure. Here, $2,638M − $700M = $1,938M; the prior-year calculation is $2,510M − $906M = $1,604M. Sysco additionally includes asset-sale proceeds of $176M and $214M, respectively, primarily from property sale-and-leaseback transactions. These transactions raise cash while creating future rental obligations. Restricted cash is subject to limits on its use, so the ending cash total is broader than the cash-and-equivalents balance shown earlier. Item 7, pp. 53–54; Item 8, p. 74; Note 1

Operating cash divided by net income was 1.53 in FY2024, 1.37 in FY2025 and 1.50 in FY2026. Those ratios use $2,989M/$1,955M, $2,510M/$1,828M and $2,638M/$1,757M. Thus, FY2026 operating cash was about one and a half times reported profit. FY2026 includes $976M of depreciation and amortization, which reduced profit without using current-period cash. Receivables absorbed $469M and inventory $293M, while increases in supplier payables and accrued expenses supplied $354M and $214M by deferring cash payments. Item 8, p. 74

The ratio alone does not establish earnings reliability. Sysco also attributes $78M of the year-over-year operating-cash improvement to lower estimated income-tax payments. Capital spending covered buildings, fleet replacements, technology and warehouse equipment; a maintenance-versus-expansion split is not disclosed. Cash capital spending equaled 0.8% of sales ($700M/$84,553M), and additional equipment was obtained through financing and leases. Item 7, p. 53

Dividends of $1,037M plus buybacks of $200M were below the $1,938M free cash flow calculated here. Net cash borrowing was $81M before debt issuance costs: $1,252M of other borrowings less $908M of repayments and $263M of net bank/commercial-paper repayments. Commercial paper is short-term borrowing. These are separate funding movements; the filing does not earmark particular borrowed dollars for distributions. Item 8, p. 74

4. Volume Improved, but Brand Mix and the Jetro Deal Add Pressure

Underlying sales activity improved, while acquisition financing creates a much larger funding decision.

U.S. Foodservice case volume, the number of cases of products sold, grew 1.4%; local-customer volume grew 1.7%. Local customers generally provide more favorable pricing than large national accounts. However, Sysco-branded products fell to 35.4% of U.S. Broadline cases, down 0.59 percentage points. Broadline operations distribute a wide assortment of food and related products. Sysco says its branded products earn higher gross margins, making their declining share an important counterweight to volume growth. Item 7, pp. 35–36, 41

At the filing date, the proposed Jetro Restaurant Depot purchase called for approximately $29.1B of consideration, including $21.6B cash, subject to customary adjustments, and 91.5M new shares of Sysco Holdings, the planned holding company. The cash component alone is much larger than existing annual free cash flow and requires external financing. Acquisition borrowing commitments are not equivalent to debt already drawn at year-end. Closing remained subject to conditions, including regulatory clearance. Note 4; Note 12

Legal exposure also remains. Note 20 describes proceedings ranging from remote to reasonably possible to probable; probable, reasonably estimable losses are accrued, meaning recorded as expenses and liabilities. Management does not expect their resolution to materially harm the company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations, but that judgment does not mean litigation risk is absent. Note 20

5. Sustaining Cash Growth Requires More Than Spending Less

Volume growth needs to translate into stronger profit after delivery, staffing and financing costs. Repeating the cash improvement depends partly on future investment requirements; the filing does not establish that lower spending can continue indefinitely. In its Capital Improvements discussion, Sysco forecasts approximately $720M of FY2027 capital spending net of asset-sale proceeds, compared with $524M in FY2026. That is a planned $196M increase on the same net basis, which would reduce company-defined free cash flow if operating cash flow were unchanged. It should not be compared directly with FY2026’s $700M of spending before asset-sale proceeds. Item 1, Capital Improvements

Sysco suspended repurchases in connection with the Jetro transaction, showing how acquisition funding changed capital allocation. Item 7, pp. 53–54

Subsequently, Sysco filed Jetro financial statements and illustrative combined financial statements that assume the transaction occurred. Those hypothetical combined figures are separate from the historical FY2026 results analyzed here. Subsequent SEC Form 8-K, Item 8.01

Source: SEC Form 10-K, filed August 21, 2026.

This analysis is based on filings submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and is provided for informational purposes only. It is not investment advice.

Go deeper than the headline

You just read what happened. Here's how to read what it means.

Free daily briefing

The day's reports, every morning — free

LineVest Daily lands in your inbox before the opening bell with the reports we published that day — what each company's latest 10-K or 10-Q actually says about the numbers, in plain English. Free, no card required.

Get LineVest Daily — free →
Order a report

This report, on any company you name

What you just read on Sysco is the format. Name any U.S.-listed company and we do the same for it — its latest SEC filing read in full, financials under US GAAP, governance, and what it means for the stock. PDF in your inbox within 3 hours.

Which company should we read?

$15 · one-time · PDF within 3 hours

Pick a company to continue

Independent journalism based on primary SEC filings — not investment advice. No brokerage affiliation.