Loading market data...
Sunday, September 20, 2026
Back to HomeStock AnalysisAll The Trade Desk coverage

The Trade Desk (TTD) Q2 FY2026: Cost Shift Lifts Sales

Share

The Trade Desk’s Q2 FY2026 sales rose 3.0% from a year earlier, but operating profit fell 13.0%. Revenue growth partly reflected changes in service and data offerings that moved certain supplier costs from revenue deductions to operating expenses. That treatment increases reported sales without itself increasing profit; the filing does not quantify how much growth it contributed. For this digital advertising platform, spending by existing customers is therefore an important additional signal—and management said it declined in Q2. Source: 10-Q, statements of operations and revenue discussion, pp. 4, 23–24.

1. Cash Rose While Customer Balances Shrank

The stronger cash balance partly reflects collections and investment maturities, rather than earnings alone.

1-1. Receivables Released Cash as Equipment Expanded

Read cash together with short-term investments; moving between them does not create new wealth. Together, these balances rose from $1,303.057 million to $1,485.333 million, or 14.0%—a smaller increase than the 70.6% rise in cash alone. Accounts receivable represent amounts customers owe, while stockholders’ equity is the balance remaining after liabilities are deducted from assets.

Item ($ millions)Dec. 31, 2025June 30, 2026Change
Cash and equivalents658.1751,122.979+70.6%
Short-term investments644.882362.354−43.8%
Accounts receivable3,770.1943,200.824−15.1%
Property and equipment, net396.819455.151+14.7%
Total assets6,153.2205,764.446−6.3%
Total liabilities3,668.8293,190.094−13.0%
Stockholders’ equity2,484.3912,574.352+3.6%

Inventories and intangible assets are not separately presented; that does not establish zero balances. Equipment investment continued despite slower sales growth. Source: balance sheets, p. 3; cash flows, p. 6.

1-2. Supplier Bills Dominate Obligations

Accounts payable—amounts owed to suppliers—fell from $3,007.651 million to $2,562.580 million; accrued expenses and other current liabilities fell from $181.991 million to $150.174 million. These are operating obligations, unlike bank borrowing. Receivables include advertising purchases billed to customers, while revenue generally excludes supplier payments, explaining their size relative to sales.

No bank borrowing appears at either balance-sheet date; the credit line was undrawn at quarter-end, so there was no outstanding bank debt whose repayment dates or interest rates needed comparing. The renewed facility expires in April 2031. Operating lease assets, representing rights to use leased property, were $335.228 million against $434.110 million of lease liabilities at June 30, 2026, compared with $342.042 million and $436.330 million, respectively, at December 31, 2025. Source: balance sheets; Notes 5, 6 and 10.

1-3. Buybacks Deepened the Deficit Despite Profits

Additional paid-in capital, an equity account that includes amounts recognized for employee share awards, rose from $3,075.303 million to $3,293.840 million, substantially reflecting employee equity compensation. The accumulated deficit widened from $590.912 million to $719.488 million: $232.967 million charged to that account for repurchased and retired shares exceeded $104.391 million of first-half earnings. This deficit therefore does not mean the company lost money during the half. No separate accumulated other comprehensive income balance—an equity account for certain gains and losses recorded outside net income—appears. Source: equity statements, p. 5.

2. Sales Growth Failed to Protect Profit

Operating margin—the share of revenue left after operating expenses—fell from 16.8% to 14.2% in Q2, a decline of 2.6 percentage points. The supplier-cost presentation change can itself reduce this percentage by increasing reported revenue without increasing profit; the filing does not quantify its separate effect on the margin.

2-1. Longer-Term Growth Masks Recent Slowing

The first-half series shows that revenue kept rising while profit stopped following it. H1 denotes January–June; net margin is the share of sales remaining after all expenses and taxes.

Item ($ millions, except margins)H1 2023H1 2024H1 2025H1 2026Three-year CAGR
Revenue847.0571,075.8031,310.0601,403.91418.3%
Operating profit18.365123.377171.229168.224109.2%
Operating margin2.2%11.5%13.1%12.0%
Net income42.265116.689140.807104.39135.2%
Net margin5.0%10.8%10.7%7.4%

The compound annual growth rate, or CAGR, is the steady annual rate that would connect the H1 2023 amount with the H1 2026 amount: (H1 2026 amount / H1 2023 amount)^(1/3) − 1. Operating profit’s unusually low starting point magnifies that rate. These are comparable six-month periods, not full fiscal years. Sources: statements of operations, p. 4, in the 2024 and 2026 10-Qs.

Q2 revenue rose from $694.039 million to $715.057 million, while operating profit fell from $116.777 million to $101.577 million. In dollar terms, the company earned $15.200 million less operating profit despite adding $21.018 million in sales. Net income fell from $90.129 million to $64.394 million as the effective tax rate—the share of pretax profit recorded as income tax expense—also rose from 32.3% to 43.1% ($43.072 million/$133.201 million versus $48.697 million/$113.091 million). Source: statements of operations; Note 9.

The quarter also missed management’s earlier revenue outlook. Actual sales were $34.943 million, or 4.7%, below the $750 million minimum forecast given on May 7. The August earnings release set Q3 revenue guidance at at least $650 million. That is a forecast floor, not a reported result or an upper limit, but it provides no assurance of a near-term rebound. Sources: Q1 prepared remarks; Q2 earnings release.

Diluted earnings per share, which allow for potential additional shares from equity awards, fell from $0.18 to $0.14. The effect of the 28.6% net-income decline on earnings per share was partly cushioned by the weighted-average diluted share count falling from 495.776 million to 469.948 million. The smaller denominator lifted earnings per share by 5.5% compared with what the same earnings would have produced at the prior-year share count. Repurchased shares were retired, although employee issuance also affects the count. Source: statements of operations; Notes 3 and 7.

2-2. Accounting Benefits and an Asset Sale Softened Costs

Platform expenses rose from $150.980 million to $184.333 million in Q2. Supplier-cost presentation changes complicate comparisons of both sales and expenses. Hosting usage and sales commissions vary with activity; salaries and infrastructure are less flexible, but the filing gives no clean fixed-versus-variable split.

Effective April 1, the company extended the estimated useful lives of certain data center computing and networking equipment from three years to four years. This reduced Q2 depreciation expense by $4.600 million; because the change began in Q2, the same benefit is included in first-half profit. This spreads equipment costs over a longer period rather than reducing the original purchase cost. An equipment-sale gain added another $13.772 million to first-half operating profit. Removing only those benefits gives operating profit of $149.852 million, versus reported $168.224 million. This supplementary calculation departs from reported U.S. accounting results and retains stock compensation; it does not fully isolate recurring earnings. Some qualifying software development is capitalized—recorded as an asset and expensed over time—so treating all development spending as an immediate expense would also be incorrect. Source: Note 2; cash flows, p. 6; platform-expense discussion, p. 24.

3. Collections Strengthened Cash Beyond Earnings

First-half operating cash improved even as net income declined.

Compare cash generated by operations with equipment and software spending before judging what remained for shareholders. Investing cash also includes purchases, sales and maturities of financial investments; a positive figure does not mean the company stopped investing in its platform.

Item ($ millions)H1 2025H1 2026Change ($ millions)
Operating cash456.446545.399+88.953
Investing cash−346.155164.919+511.074
Financing cash−583.367−245.514+337.853
Ending cash896.3871,122.979+226.592
Equipment purchases104.352125.966+21.614
Capitalized software cash spending5.7397.399+1.660
Free cash flow346.355412.034+65.679

The ending-cash row compares June 30, 2025 with June 30, 2026. Section 1 instead compares December 31, 2025 with June 30, 2026; the different starting dates explain the different cash increases.

Free cash flow here means operating cash less equipment and capitalized software spending. Thus, $545.399 million − $125.966 million − $7.399 million = $412.034 million. This was sufficient to cover $241.331 million of cash buybacks, down from $647.093 million. The cash paid for buybacks is a different measure from the portion charged to accumulated deficit in Section 1-3. Equipment and capitalized software cash spending was 9.5% of revenue; maintenance and expansion spending are not separately quantified. Source: cash flows, p. 6; equity statements, p. 5.

Receivables released $548.109 million, partly offset by $427.941 million used to reduce payables. These are cash-flow statement adjustments, rather than simple differences between the balance-sheet amounts in Section 1. Operating cash divided by net income rose from 2.29 times in H1 2024 ($266.731 million/$116.689 million) to 3.24 times in H1 2025 and 5.22 times in H1 2026. Stock compensation, a noncash expense added back when calculating operating cash, also contributes. These ratios show cash generation relative to reported earnings, but do not establish that the sustainability of earnings improved proportionately. Sources: cash flows, p. 6, in the 2024 and 2026 filings.

4. Existing-Customer Spending Matters More Than Headline Sales

The filing leaves important limits on measuring how customer spending translates into revenue.

Management attributed Q2 gross-spending growth to new clients, partly offset by existing-client declines. Gross spending means advertising dollars routed through the platform. Management also cited higher pricing for value-added services and changes in offerings that moved certain supplier costs into operating expenses; volume and other discounts partly offset those revenue increases. The revenue discussion does not quantify gross spending or the share of that spending recognized as revenue, preventing a numerical separation of volume growth from pricing and presentation effects. Source: revenue discussion, pp. 23–24.

Stock-based compensation—pay delivered through equity—fell from 19.6% to 15.6% of first-half sales ($257.138 million/$1,310.060 million versus $218.602 million/$1,403.914 million). It remains a material shareholder cost despite requiring no immediate cash payment, because issuing shares can reduce existing shareholders’ ownership percentage. Alongside customer spending and equipment and software spending relative to revenue, this is a key platform metric. Source: revenue discussion; Note 8.

The securities class action survived a motion to dismiss, meaning the case can proceed rather than that the allegations have been proven. Management disputes the allegations, and Note 11 does not quantify a reasonably possible loss range; absence of an estimate does not mean zero exposure. Separately, the company announced Kokai Zuma on August 27, after quarter-end. The release updates its advertising platform, but does not establish a recovery in customer spending. Sources: Note 11; company product announcement.

5. Cash Provides Room, but Customer Weakness Persists

Revenue and cash grew, but the Q2 decline in existing-client spending and shrinking reported margins limit the strength of that growth. Cash generation covered both platform investment and buybacks, reducing immediate financing pressure, although advertising demand remains sensitive to economic conditions. A stronger earnings trajectory requires customer spending and fees to cover infrastructure and employee costs without relying on favorable accounting effects.

Amounts are consolidated and unaudited. Tables use $ millions; calculations use the unrounded filing amounts. H1 means the six months ended June 30. Changes, margins, growth rates and supplementary measures are calculated from the cited filings, except the revenue guidance comparison, which also uses management’s cited outlook. Primary filing accession: 0001671933-26-000086. The primary SEC Form 10-Q was filed August 6, 2026.

This analysis is based on filings submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the cited company materials, and is provided for informational purposes only. It is not investment advice.

Go deeper than the headline

You just read what happened. Here's how to read what it means.

Free daily briefing

The day's reports, every morning — free

LineVest Daily lands in your inbox before the opening bell with the reports we published that day — what each company's latest 10-K or 10-Q actually says about the numbers, in plain English. Free, no card required.

Get LineVest Daily — free →
Order a report

This report, on any company you name

What you just read on The Trade Desk is the format. Name any U.S.-listed company and we do the same for it — its latest SEC filing read in full, financials under US GAAP, governance, and what it means for the stock. PDF in your inbox within 3 hours.

Which company should we read?

$15 · one-time · PDF within 3 hours

Pick a company to continue

Independent journalism based on primary SEC filings — not investment advice. No brokerage affiliation.