SK REIT (395400.KS) Q1 2026: 0% Vacancy Intact but ₩33.9B Interest Devours 63% of Operating Profit
A fully-leased SK Group portfolio locks in rental income, but the cost of carrying ₩3.10 trillion in debt — not tenant performance — will determine whether four-times-a-year dividends remain sustainable.
Source: 20th-Term Business Report — Filed June 10, 2026 with DART | Consolidated Financial Statements | Unit: ₩ billions
SK REIT's 20th-term results (January 1 – March 31, 2026) deliver a split verdict on the central question investors ask of this vehicle: can it sustain quarterly dividend payments? On the leasing side, the case is solid — the ₩5.23 trillion investment property portfolio operates predominantly under triple-net leases with SK Group affiliates as master tenants (the sole exception being a small retail strip in Jongno Tower), and vacancy across the flagship offices is effectively zero. The pressure point lies entirely in financing, not occupancy: of ₩53.9 billion in operating profit generated during the quarter, ₩33.9 billion — 63% — was consumed by interest expense, leaving net income of ₩20.5 billion (₩19.4 billion attributable to the parent). SK REIT is the first Korean listed REIT to pay dividends four times a year, and it distributed ₩21.0 billion this quarter, marginally exceeding the period's own earnings; approximately ₩1.08 trillion in contracted future lease payments provides clear forward revenue visibility, but what remains opaque is the trajectory of refinancing rates as serial loan maturities approach.
A note on the reporting calendar: SK REIT operates on a three-month fiscal year — each "term" (기) covers a single calendar quarter. The 20th term corresponds to Q1 2026 (January–March), the 19th term to Q4 2025 (October–December), and the 18th term to Q3 2025 (July–September). All income statement and cash flow comparisons in this report are therefore quarter-on-quarter (QoQ), while balance sheet figures represent end-of-period snapshots.
Balance Sheet
Assets: Investment Properties Define the Enterprise
| Line Item | Q3 2025 (18th Term) | Q4 2025 (19th Term) | Q1 2026 (20th Term) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents | 94.2 | 53.7 | 73.4 |
| Non-current assets held for sale | 16.1 | 24.8 | 61.0 |
| Total current assets | 136.3 | 124.1 | 169.0 |
| Investment properties | 4,914.7 | 5,297.0 | 5,232.7 |
| Total assets | 5,062.4 | 5,433.9 | 5,408.8 |
Unit: ₩ billions
Investment properties representing 96.7% of total assets make the balance sheet a near-pure expression of a single asset class. The step-change between the 18th and 19th terms — total assets ₩371.5 billion higher at year-end 2025 — was driven by the November 2025 acquisition of SK-P Tower at a purchase price of ₩360.7 billion, which lifted investment properties from ₩4.91 trillion to ₩5.30 trillion in a single quarter. In the 20th term, investment properties declined modestly by ₩64.3 billion; the primary driver was the reclassification of additional gas station assets into non-current assets held for sale, which grew from ₩24.8 billion to ₩61.0 billion. Clean Energy REIT, a fully consolidated subsidiary, holds SK Energy-branded petrol stations and is executing a phased disposal programme; nine remaining sites are actively being marketed.
Fair Value Accounting: Book Value Already Reflects Market Prices
A critical accounting feature shapes every line of the balance sheet: SK REIT applies the fair value model — not the cost model — to its investment properties, revaluing them each period to external appraiser assessments. The notes confirm that "the carrying amount of investment properties corresponds to the valuation amount from the external appraiser's report." This means the balance sheet already embeds current market valuations. SK Serin Building, acquired at ₩1.003 trillion, carried a mid-point appraised value of ₩1.319 trillion as of end-2025, a cumulative gain of 31.5% over acquisition cost; SK U-Tower, acquired at ₩507.2 billion, stood at ₩632.3 billion, up 24.7%. These revaluation gains were recognised through prior-period profit and loss and are already absorbed into equity — there is no hidden cushion waiting to be unlocked. The corollary is adverse: if property market conditions deteriorate, unrealised losses flow directly through the income statement, amplifying earnings volatility in a way that a cost-model REIT would avoid entirely. This characteristic fundamentally alters the earnings quality profile relative to peers and warrants explicit attention when assigning a dividend sustainability multiple.
Debt Structure: Finance Liabilities Dominate the Liability Stack
| Financial Liability | Q4 2025 (19th Term) | Q1 2026 (20th Term) |
|---|---|---|
| Current portion of long-term borrowings | 668.5 | 669.1 |
| Current portion of bonds | 451.8 | 574.6 |
| Long-term borrowings | 1,463.2 | 1,451.2 |
| Bonds (non-current) | 548.4 | 408.9 |
| Total interest-bearing debt | 3,131.9 | 3,103.8 |
| Lease deposits (current + non-current) | 201.2 | 203.6 |
Unit: ₩ billions
Of total liabilities of approximately ₩3.38 trillion, interest-bearing debt accounts for ₩3.10 trillion — essentially the entire liability stack. Trade payables and other operating liabilities are immaterial. The debt-to-equity ratio stands at approximately 167% (₩3.38T ÷ ₩2.03T), and the loan-to-value ratio based on appraised asset values is approximately 57%. That LTV is already measured against fair value, not historical cost, which is an important nuance: there is no cost-to-market buffer to absorb a deterioration in appraised values before covenants become a concern.
Maturity is well-laddered across the medium term: individual tranches fall due in September 2026 (facilities linked to an SK Hynix water treatment centre), July 2027, and June, October, and November 2028, among others. The lender base is diversified across Standard Chartered Korea, KB Kookmin Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC), Mizuho Bank, Chinese commercial banks, and domestic life insurers including Hanwha Life and Kyobo Life. All-in interest rates on existing facilities range from approximately 3.54% to 4.21% across most tranches, with one tranche carrying 5.49%. The refinancing terms achieved on the September 2026 maturity — the nearest material event on the debt calendar — will be the primary near-term determinant of forward finance costs.
Capital Structure, Shareholders, and Dilution Resolution
Parent shareholders' equity of ₩1.94 trillion is underpinned by additional paid-in capital of ₩1.23 trillion. Retained earnings of ₩559.0 billion are virtually unchanged from the prior quarter (₩560.6 billion) because the 20th-term net income of ₩19.4 billion attributable to the parent was almost entirely offset by the ₩21.0 billion dividend distributed. This mirrors the structure of all prior quarters: SK REIT accumulates no internal capital, paying out essentially 100% of periodic earnings to comply with the statutory requirement that REITs distribute 90% or more of distributable income.
Common share capital has increased incrementally — from ₩147.6 billion in the 18th term to ₩150.5 billion in the 20th — as outstanding convertible bonds were progressively converted into shares: ₩5.5 billion in the 20th term, ₩24.7 billion in the 19th, and ₩20.9 billion in the 18th. The current convertible bond balance reached zero in the 20th term, eliminating this source of progressive dilution going forward.
Non-controlling interests of ₩81.2 billion represent the minority shareholders and preferred holders of Clean Industrial REIT, consolidated at an 80.15% ownership interest (88.98% voting rights).
On the ownership side, SK Corporation holds 29.09% as the largest single shareholder. Mirae Asset's TIGER Real Estate Infrastructure ETF (held via Shinhan Bank trust) owns 10.28%, and the Korean Federation of Community Credit Cooperatives (새마을금고중앙회) holds 5.55%. The three fully consolidated subsidiaries are Clean Energy REIT (100% owned), Total Value No. 1 REIT (100% owned), and Clean Industrial REIT (80.15% economic ownership, 88.98% voting).
Income Statement
Core Metrics
| Line Item | Q3 2025 (18th) | Q4 2025 (19th) | Q1 2026 (20th) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 56.7 | 70.4 | 63.4 |
| Operating expenses | 6.4 | 5.8 | 9.5 |
| Operating profit | 50.3 | 64.6 | 53.9 |
| Operating margin (%) | 88.7 | 91.7 | 85.0 |
| Finance costs | 30.9 | 31.6 | 33.9 |
| Net income | 20.3 | 33.6 | 20.5 |
| Net income (parent attributable) | 19.1 | 32.4 | 19.4 |
| Basic EPS (₩ per share) | 65.64 | 109.07 | 64.41 |
Unit: ₩ billions (EPS in ₩)
Reading Through the Apparent Revenue Decline
The 20th-term operating revenue of ₩63.4 billion appears to represent a 9.9% sequential decline from the 19th term's ₩70.4 billion, but this comparison requires careful reading. The bulk of the gap is an accounting artefact, not a weakening in rental performance. Per note 16 to the financial statements (Operating Revenue), the 19th-term figure incorporated a ₩10.8 billion fair value gain on investment properties; the 20th-term fair value gain was zero. Stripping that non-cash component out of both periods, underlying rental income actually increased from ₩55.3 billion (19th term) to ₩57.6 billion (20th term) — a sequential improvement of ₩2.3 billion. Relative to the 18th term's ₩56.7 billion in pure rental income, the 20th term shows a 1.6% increase, reflecting the first full quarter of rental income from SK-P Tower, which was acquired late in 2025.
The same decomposition applies to the apparent collapse in net income from ₩33.6 billion to ₩20.5 billion. The 19th term was inflated by the ₩10.8 billion one-time valuation gain; the 20th term without any such gain reverts to a level essentially in line with the 18th term's ₩20.3 billion. In this respect, the 20th term should be understood as normalised earnings, not deterioration. Investors who benchmark solely against the immediately preceding quarter will misread both revenue and earnings trend.
The operating margin compression to 85.0% from 91.7% similarly warrants disaggregation. Under the fair value model, there is no depreciation charge on investment properties — the entire ₩9.5 billion operating expense in the 20th term represents outsourced management fees (asset custody, property and asset management fees payable to external operators), plus timing differences in cost recognition related to the held-for-sale reclassification. This is periodic in nature rather than a structural shift in the cost base.
Finance Costs: The Decisive Earnings Variable
For a company whose revenue is almost entirely locked in through long-term triple-net contracts, the income statement is less a measure of commercial performance than a measure of financing efficiency. The ₩33.9 billion finance cost in the 20th term stands against ₩53.9 billion in operating profit, leaving a margin of ₩20.0 billion before tax. Effective income tax is zero — Korean listed REITs benefit from the dividend paid deduction (배당소득공제) that offsets virtually all taxable income when substantially all earnings are distributed, as SK REIT does.
Finance costs have risen in a step pattern precisely tracking asset expansion: ₩30.9 billion (18th term) → ₩31.6 billion (19th term) → ₩33.9 billion (20th t



